Specialise - Form Cycle - First-up

Wizard Daily Report and Research - Tuesday, 21 November 2023.

 

  • Form cycle - Runs from a spell - First-up.
  • Research - Trainers - Trainers Notebook.

 

Better betting - Specialise - Form cycle, runs from a spell.

Currently, I am looking at the issue of the amount of horse racing on offer, and how we might find a way to focus on certain special circumstances where we can exploit a general lack of information.

Today, we commence a discussion on the form cycle of the racehorse and how one could specialise in this area of form analysis.

Form Cycle - First-up

One of the essential skills of form analysis is the ability to evaluate a horses' level of fitness. By carefully considering its past history, barrier trial form, and the manner in which it ran its most recent races we can come to a logical conclusion about its level of fitness. 

Back from a Spell 

Some horses come to hand very quickly. Horses with ability often win at their first, second, or third starts after returning from a spell. Many trainers will aim to capitalise on the freshness of their horse and set them to win at this early stage of a preparation.

Indeed, some trainers, are "first-up specialists". How can we recognize a potential first- up winner? 

First-Up 

Relatively few horses are capable of registering a first- up win against a field of similar-class, race-fit gallopers. Those that are, have often done so in the past. 

Search the horse's performance history. If the horse has won first-up previously it is quite likely that its trainer will attempt to repeat the performance. History often repeats itself on the racecourse. (The Wizard provides details about the horses record at a number of runs since a spell.)

To assist in your understanding of the first-up galloper, the first-up form of every 3yo and older horse trained by ten of Sydney's top trainers over a period of three years was analysed. (Note: This analysis does not reflect the current premiership standings.)

When studying the following figures remember you are seeing the efforts of some of the top people in their profession. The less successful stables can be expected to produce lower strike rates than those you see below.

The figures show the performance of first-up horses under various criteria and come in two categories; all first-up runners irrespective of odds, and only those first-up horses which have a starting price of 10/1 or less. The latter category is the more meaningful because these horses have obviously been supported in the market and could have been expected to perform creditably.

Table 1  - First-up winners

(3yo and older)  (1000m-1300m)

              <= 10/1   any odds

Year 1      22%         13%

Year 2      20%         11%

Year 3      19%          9%               

As you can see from table 1 the figures are quite stable on a year-to-year basis. Also, the message is clear from table 1 that you should concentrate on those first-up horses which are in the market to maximize your chance of success.

With respect to the sex of the horse it seems to make no difference whether the horse is male or female (see table 2).

Table 2 - First-up winners by sex

(3yo and older) (1000m - 1300m)

                  <= 10/1      any odds

females        23%          10%

males           22%          12%

Table 3 shows that the age of the galloper is not an especially significant factor, except that horses 7yo and older from even these top stables have poor prospects when resuming. 

Table 3 - First-up winners (age)                     

(3yo and older)  (1000m-1300m)

Age        <= 10/1      any odds

3yo           20%            10%

4yo           28%            14%

5yo           23%           10%

6yo           22%           12%

7yo+          0                  0

Table 4 that shows first-up horses are only half as likely to win on heavy tracks. This fact is worth bearing in mind.

Table 4 First-up winners (State of Track)

(3yo and older) (1000m - 1300m)

SOT           <= 10/1     any odds

good               23%          11%

soft                 26%          13%

heavy             13%           8%

Finally, from the Wizard Trainers Notebook currently published here in the Daily Report, we found that the following top 10 Sydney trainers in 2022-2023 had an Impact Value of 1.3 or better under the freshness criteria:

Chris Waller                  2yo - 1st up from a spell

                                      2yo - days since last run 61-179

James Cummings       3yo - days since last run 180-365

                                      3yo+ - days since last run 180-365

C Maher, D Eustace    3yo - days since last run 180-365

Annabel Neasham      3yo - 1st up from a spell

Joseph Pride                3yo+ - days since last run 61-365

                                      3yo+ - 1st up from a spell

M, W, J Hawkes          2yo - 1st up from a spell

                                      3yo+ - 1st up from a spell

                                      3yo+ - days since last run 61-365

John O'Shea                3yo - days since last run 180-365

Tomorrow I will continue this discussion.

Warren

If you have any comment or suggestions about the Wizard Daily articles please feel free to drop me a line at:

Wiz-Ed@everyrace.com

 

Research Trainers Trainers Notebook.

Today the Wizard Trainers Notebook examines trainers ranked 1 to 10 on the Tasmanian metropolitan tracks in the 2022-2023 racing season.

For this notebook presentation I have broken down the overall stats into age groups (2yo, 3yo, 4yo and older) as there can be a difference in how these various age groups are prepared and perform. Also, I have limited the analysis to only those runs that were at odds of 10/1 or less, thereby removing the noise created by the longer odds runs which are really of no relevance in this exercise.

The results shown are only those where the trainer had an impact value of 1.3 or better, so a significant performance, and one can say under these conditions the stable has outperformed its expected result.

Note: It is possible to have more than one entry for a single factor. For example, the stable may have outperformed when backing up both within 8-14 days and 30-60 days.

Because the data is drawn from the Wizards national database, the form factors will be the same for trainers when they appear in the top trainer list in more than one state.

Warren

If you have any comment or suggestions about the Wizard Daily articles please feel free to drop me a line at:

Wiz-Ed@everyrace.com

First, an apology. There was a typo in the Hayes' Stable Trainers Notebook. Two entries were listed as last wins, rather than last runs. Below, is the correct version.

 2yo3yo4yo and older
B, W, JD HayesInsufficient datadays since last run 30-60days since last run 8-14
  days since last win 15-21days since last run 22-28
  Field Strength -0.5 to +0.5days since last run 180-365
  Field Strength -4.5 to -3.0days since last win 22-28
  finish last start: 2nd or 3rdfinish last start: 1st
  previous beaten margin: 0.1-3.0previous beaten margin: 0.1-3.0
  runs from a spell: 2nd upruns from a spell: 4th up
  dist change: +101 to +300mruns from a spell: 6th up
   weight change: -3.5 or more
   dist change: -300 to -101m

 

                    Wizard - Trainer's Notebook - Trainers ranked 1 to 10 in the Tasmanian 2022-2023 metropolitan premiership table.

 2yo3yo4yo and older
Scott BruntonInsufficient datadays since last run 22-28days since last win 15-21
  Field Strength +1.0 to +2.5days since last win 30-60
  finish last start: 1stfinish last start: 1st
  finish last start: 2nd or 3rdfinish last start: 1st
  runs from a spell: 2nd updist change: -300 to -101m
    
John BlackerInsufficient datadays since last run 1-7days since last win 8-14
  days since last run 15-21days since last win 15-21
  days since last run 22-28days since last win 22-28
  Field Strength -2.5 to -1.0finish last start: 1st
  finish last start: 2nd or 3rdfinish last start: 2nd or 3rd
  runs from a spell: 4th upruns from a spell: 3rd up
  dist change: -300 to -101mweight change: +3.0 to +4.5
   weight change: +5.0 higher
    
Adam TrinderInsufficient datadays since last run 180-365days since last run 30-60
  days since last win 8-14days since last win 8-14
  days since last win 15-21days since last win 22-28
  Field Strength +1.0 to +2.5Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5
  finish last start: 1stfinish last start: 1st
  previous beaten margin: 3.1-5.0runs from a spell: 5th up
  runs from a spell: 1st up 
  runs from a spell: 3rd up 
  dist change: -300 to -101m 
    
Leon, Dean, Trent WellsInsufficient datadays since last run 15-21days since last win 30-60
  finish last start: 1stdays since last win 61-179
  previous beaten margin: 3.1-5.0Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5
  runs from a spell: 1st updist change: -300 to -101m
  runs from a spell: 4th up 
    
Glenn StevensonInsufficient dataruns from a spell: 3rd updays since last run 30-60
   days since last run 61-179
   days since last win 8-14
   days since last win 30-60
   Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5
   finish last start: 1st
   runs from a spell: 1st up
   runs from a spell: 5th up
    
Gary WhiteInsufficient dataInsufficient datadays since last run 8-14
   Field Strength +1.0 to +2.5
   finish last start: 1st
   finish last start: 2nd or 3rd
   previous beaten margin: 0.1-3.0
   runs from a spell: 2nd up
   runs from a spell: 3rd up
   weight change: 0.0 to +2.5
    
Stuart GandyInsufficient dataweight change: -2.5 to -1.0days since last run 1-7
  finish last start: 1stdays since last run 22-28
   days since last win 30-60
   weight change: +1.0 to +2.5
   finish last start: 2nd or 3rd
   previous beaten margin: 0.1-3.0
   runs from a spell: 6th up
   dist change: -300 to -101m
    
Tegan KeysInsufficient dataInsufficient datadays since last run 15-21
   days since last run 22-28
   days since last win 22-28
   Field Strength -5.0 to -3.0
   Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5
   finish last start: 1st
   runs from a spell: 2nd up
   runs from a spell: 6th up
    
Barry CampbellInsufficient dataField Strength -0.5 to +0.5days since last run 61-179
  finish last start: 2nd or 3rddays since last win 8-14
  runs from a spell: 2nd upfinish last start: 1st
  dist change: +101 to +300mprevious beaten margin: 0.1-3.0
    
John LuttrellInsufficient dataprevious beaten margin: 0.1-3.0days since last run 15-21
  dist change: -100 to +100mdays since last win 8-14
   days since last win 15-21
   Field Strength -5.0 or more
   Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5
   finish last start: 1st
   previous beaten margin: 3.1-5.0
   dist change: -300 to -101m


back