Wizard Daily Report and Research - Saturday, 8 June 2024.
- Jockey & Trainer combinations (Zac Lloyd)
- Trainer & Jockey combinations (Nathan Doyle)
- Wizard Ratings Results for Friday, June 7
Jockey & Trainer combinations (Zac LLoyd)
This table examines jockey-trainer combinations under three conditions:
- When the horse is the Wrat 100 pointer and started at odds between $2.00 and $5.90
- When the horse runs as the race favourite at odds between $2.00 and $5.90
- When the horse starts at odds between $2.00 and $5.90
From 01/08/2022 To 07/06/2024 | | 100 | | | | | fav | | | | | 2.0-5.9 | | |
Zac Lloyd with | win% | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | unp | win% | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | unp | win% | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | unp |
C J Waller | 37.5% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 40.0% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 43.8% | 7 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
James Cummings | 23.0% | 14 | 12 | 11 | 24 | 28.3% | 17 | 5 | 11 | 27 | 27.9% | 36 | 25 | 22 | 46 |
M, W & J Hawkes | 25.0% | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 18.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 27.1% | 13 | 5 | 10 | 20 |
Matthew Smith | 50.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54.5% | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Michael Freedman | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
A & E Cummings | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
A J Cummings | - | - | - | - | - | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Annabel Neasham | 11.1% | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 22.2% | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14.3% | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
Ben & Will & Jd Hayes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bjorn Baker | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.6% | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Brad Widdup | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Bryce Heys | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
C E Conners | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
C J Waller | 37.5% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 40.0% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 43.8% | 7 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
Ciaron Maher | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 25.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7.7% | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
D Lane | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Daniel Robinson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Danielle Seib | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
David Pfieffer | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
G Waterhouse & A Bott | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
J Attard & L Keegan-Attard | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
J C Deamer | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
J G Sargent | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 42.9% | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
J O'Shea | 66.7% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 30.0% | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
J P Thompson | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
James Cummings | 23.0% | 14 | 12 | 11 | 24 | 28.3% | 17 | 5 | 11 | 27 | 27.9% | 36 | 25 | 22 | 46 |
Joseph Burges | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joseph Pride | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
M & W & J Hawkes | - | - | - | - | - | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
M F Van Gestel | - | - | - | - | - | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
M, W & J Hawkes | 25.0% | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 18.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 27.1% | 13 | 5 | 10 | 20 |
Matthew Dunn | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 60.0% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Matthew Smith | 50.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54.5% | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Michael Freedman | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Ms K Buchanan | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
P & P Snowden | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 27.3% | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
P M Perry | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
P Niceforo | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paul Messara | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sara Ryan | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Stirling Osland | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
T Wong | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The statistics cover the jockey's rides throughout Australia, with combinations that have 5 wins or more highlighted separately as well as being included in the body of the table. Included in the table are only those stables for which the jockey has registered at least one win in the $2.00 - $5.90 odds range during the period covered which is from 1 August 2022, so last season and the current season.
Trainer & Jockey combinations for (Nathan Doyle)
This table examines trainer-jockey combinations under three conditions:
- When the horse is the Wrat 100 pointer and started at odds between $2.00 and $5.90
- When the horse runs as the race favourite at odds between $2.00 and $5.90
- When the horse starts at odds between $2.00 and $5.90
From 01/08/2022 To 07/06/2024 | | 100 | | | | | fav | | | | | 2.0-5.9 | | |
Nathan Doyle with | win% | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | unp | win% | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | unp | win% | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | unp |
Ashley Morgan | 36.4% | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 27.6% | 8 | 4 | 4 | 13 |
Koby Jennings | 15.8% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 31.8% | 7 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 27.5% | 14 | 5 | 7 | 25 |
Mitchell Bell | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 42.9% | 6 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Anna Roper | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ashley Morgan | 36.4% | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 27.6% | 8 | 4 | 4 | 13 |
Ben Looker | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 28.6% | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Benjamin Osmond | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27.3% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Dylan Gibbons | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30.8% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
Jasper Franklin | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16.7% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Kerrin McEvoy | - | - | - | - | - | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 57.1% | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Koby Jennings | 15.8% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 31.8% | 7 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 27.5% | 14 | 5 | 7 | 25 |
Lee Magorrian | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18.2% | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
Mitch Stapleford | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Mitchell Bell | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 42.9% | 6 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
Nick Heywood | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rory Hutchings | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Shayleigh Ingelse | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Taylor Marshall | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Tim Clark | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Tommy Berry | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 25.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Tyler Schiller | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
William Pike | 50.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
The statistics cover the stable's runners throughout Australia, with combinations that have 5 wins or more highlighted separately as well as being included in the body of the table. Included in the table are only those jockeys who have ridden at least one winner for the stable in the $2.00 - $5.90 odds range during the period covered which is from 1 August 2022, so last season and the current season.
Wizard Ratings Results for Friday, June 7
The following table shows where the winner of each race run yesterday was rated by Wrat, Wmod, Whcp, and Wexpk. The Wrat analysis applies to both Wizard and Wizard Plus. The Wmod, Whcp, and Wexpk analysis applies to the ratings included in the Wizard Plus 'Plus Panel'.
Fri 07.06.24 | | Race 1 | Race 2 | Race 3 | Race 4 | Race 5 | Race 6 | Race 7 | Race 8 | Race 9 | Race 10 | Top rated | Top 2 rated |
| SOT | wmhe | wmhe | wmhe | wmhe | wmhe | wmhe | wmhe | wmhe | wmhe | wmhe | w m h e | w m h e |
ALBURY | s6s5 | 2 - - 3 | 1 1 - 2 | 2 1 2 - | - - 2. - | - 3. - - | - - - - | - - - - | 1 1 - - | | | 2 3 0 0 | 4 3 2. 1 |
DUBBO | s7h10 | - - 3 3 | 1 1 1. 3 | - - - - | 2 2 1 - | - - - - | - - 3 - | 3 - 1 3. | - - 3 - | | | 1 1 3. 0 | 2 2 3. 0 |
IPSWICH | s5 | 3 - 1 - | 1 1 1 3 | 2 2 1 1 | 1 1 2 - | 3 1 - - | 1 2. 1 - | - - - 1 | 3 2 - - | | | 3 3 4 2 | 4 6. 5 2 |
SWAN HILL | g4 | - - - - | 1 3 - - | 1 1 1 2 | - 2 2 1 | 2 - - 2 | - - - 2 | 1 1 1. 1 | 1 2 - - | | | 4 2 2. 2 | 5 4 3. 5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | w 10 32 | w 15 32 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 31.5% | 47.0% |
Header: w m h e = Wrat (w), Wmod (m), Whcp (h), Wexpk (e)
The Wizard Ratings Results report includes the results of the top-two rated Wrat runners. This information should provide a better guide to those subscribers who are interested in backing two runners in a race (where odds are acceptable) or anchor two runners for multiples etc. (Note: Over the long term the top-two Wrat runners have won around 43% to 46%, and the top rated runner 25% to 27%, of races on a seasonal basis)
For a full explanation of the table click: How to read the Wizard Ratings Results
Warren - Wiz-Ed
If you have any comment or suggestions about the Wizard Daily articles please feel free to drop me a line at:
Wiz-Ed (@) everyrace.com