Wizard Daily Report and Research - Tuesday, 28 November 2023.
- The Distance Factor - Failed and first time.
- Research - Trainers - Trainers Notebook. Enhanced.
Better betting - Specialise - Distance - Failed and First time
Today we continue a discussion of the distance ability of a horse, a key area for investigation in form analysis.
Failed at the Distance
Let us assume that the horse has previously failed at the distance of the forthcoming race (or within +/-10% of the distance).
* First, how many failures have been recorded at this distance?
* Second, did its finishing effort indicate winning potential at this distance?
One unexplained failure, with no successes in the distance range, can usually be forgiven. However, if such a horse has failed more than once when obviously well fancied and otherwise suited by the conditions of the race then it can be considered "suspect" at the distance and it can be penalized to reflect the fact. Such a galloper should not be seen as a strong first selection until it shows it can handle the distance satisfactorily.
Of course, if there is a good explanation for its failure (for example, blocked in the straight when attempting a run or missed the start) then it can be evaluated under the following section (First Time at Distance).
If a horse has failed at the distance (with no obvious excuse) closely examine its finishing run.
* Was it tiring and losing ground during the last 200m? (We are assuming that the horse was fully fit).
If the answer is "Yes"... WAIT for evidence that it CAN cope with the distance.
* Was it fully extended: whilst not making up any real ground on the leaders it was not losing ground. That is, it ran an even race in the straight.
If the answer is "Yes" - Can be supported but watched closely for further confirmation that this journey is within its distance range.
* Was it running on strongly and overhauling the leaders which were not tiring?
If the answer is "Yes" - Can be supported. The experience should assist at the next attempt.
The problem horse in this category is the young improving galloper who may have failed at a specific distance when last in work, but who is now attempting that distance again this time up. With increased maturity and experience it may have no difficulty in coping with the distance on this occasion. If you are confronted with this situation, you may be best evaluating the given horse under the following section (First Time at Distance).
First time at the Distance
When this situation arises, and it frequently occurs, we are forced to analyse the horse's past performances in order to determine whether its distance ability is likely to encompass the distance of the forthcoming race. Mind you, we are not alone in having to make these judgements. At times not even those closely associated with a horse will know whether it can handle a new distance either.
The following are some of the points to consider. (Note: These can also be applied to the situation where the galloper has registered a failure at the distance).
* Does the horses' breeding indicate that it will run the distance?
* How does it finish at the end of its races closest in distance to the forthcoming event? To answer this question you should use race videos.
- Was it fully extended with nothing in reserve and being overhauled by closers?
- Was it tiring and shortening stride at the end of its race. (Remember: We are assuming that the horse is fully fit and that improved racing condition won't help it see out the extra distance on this occasion.)
If the answer to either of the above is "Yes", then the horse can be considered suspect at the longer distance, particularly if at the longer distance it is to meet the same class of horse and must carry the same or higher weight.
In this case the horse can be downgraded or even eliminated from your final list of possibilities or appropriately penalised when handicapping the field. It is prudent to wait until it has proven that it can handle the extra distance before backing it as a strong first selection.
- Was it running on strongly, holding the opposition at bay... perhaps increasing its advantage over the last 100 metres?
- Was it finishing strongly at the end of the race, making up ground on the leaders which were not weakening and perhaps running on strongly after reaching the winning post?
If the answer to either of the above is "Yes", then the horse has indicated that it should cope with the extra distance. Once you have satisfied yourself that it is capable of running out the journey it can become a qualified selection. However, if any real doubt remains either wait or penalise the galloper in question so that it does not become one of your strong selections for the race.
Tomorrow, distance switches.
Warren - Wiz-Ed
If you have any comment or suggestions about the Wizard Daily articles please feel free to drop me a line at:
Wiz-Ed@everyrace.com
Adelaide top 20 in 2022-2023 Stats for Distance Ranges
Today, looking at the performance of the top 20 trainers on the Adelaide metropolitan track in the last season, across seven distance ranges, from the sprinter to the stayer. These stats cover the past 10 years for all runners in the distance range with a starting price of 10/1 or less.
| to 1199m | 1200-1399m | 1400-1699m | 1700-1899m | 1900-2199m | 2200-2500m | over 2500m |
| win runs % | win runs % | win runs % | win runs % | win runs % | win runs % | win runs % |
Richard, Chantelle Jolly | 116 459 25.3 | 89 367 24.3 | 46 241 19.1 | 17 58 29.3 | 12 61 19.7 | 3 11 27.3 | 1 12 8.3 |
Phillip Stokes | 254 1035 24.5 | 250 1101 22.7 | 253 1050 24.1 | 16 97 16.5 | 49 195 25.1 | 10 48 20.8 | 9 40 22.5 |
Michael Hickmott | 35 159 22.00 | 52 224 23.2 | 69 350 19.7 | 6 39 15.4 | 16 94 17.0 | 6 22 27.3 | 10 31 32.3 |
G Richards, D Moyle | 19 106 17.9 | 5 72 6.9 | 27 113 23.9 | 5 19 26.3 | 4 28 14.3 | 4 13 30.8 | 1 12 8.3 |
L Macdonald. A Gluyas | 60 271 22.1 | 117 636 18.4 | 92 530 17.4 | 22 96 22.9 | 51 177 28.8 | 16 55 29.1 | 4 29 13.8 |
David Jolly | 156 757 20.6 | 111 530 20.9 | 33 244 13.5 | 16 48 33.3 | 10 56 17.9 | 3 7 42.9 | nil |
W Clarken, N O'Shea | 110 497 22.1 | 92 433 21.1 | 72 357 20.1 | 14 49 28.6 | 11 61 18.0 | nil | nil |
Ryan Balfour | 87 504 17.3 | 110 535 20.6 | 61 452 13.5 | 9 87 10.3 | 18 108 16.7 | 7 31 22.6 | 3 22 13.6 |
B, W, JD Hayes | 58 296 19.6 | 92 466 19.7 | 124 556 22.3 | 6 45 13.3 | 13 80 16.3 | 4 26 15.4 | 5 24 20.8 |
Chris Bieg | 27 129 20.9 | 46 228 20.2 | 39 233 16.7 | 5 32 15.6 | 7 32 21.9 | 1 7 14.3 | 0 2 0 |
Peter, Belinda Blanch | 17 87 19.5 | 18 107 16.8 | 21 88 23.8 | 6 30 20.0 | 4 37 10.8 | nil | nil |
Peter Hardacre | 23 136 16.9 | 41 201 20.4 | 48 287 16.7 | 13 69 18.8 | 16 86 18.6 | 1 6 16.7 | 1 5 20.0 |
Travis Doudle | 46 193 23.8 | 39 203 19.2 | 53 233 22.7 | 9 70 12.9 | 20 88 22.7 | 3 20 15.0 | 1 11 9.1 |
Shane, Cassie Oxlade | 36 190 18.9 | 37 236 15.6 | 25 143 17.5 | 7 33 21.1 | 8 53 15.0 | 3 14 21.4 | 3 23 13.0 |
D Clarken, O MacGillvray | 19 106 17.9 | 24 102 23.5 | 32 127 25.2 | 6 24 25.0 | 5 25 20.0 | 1 6 16.6 | 3 6 50.0 |
John Macmillan | 37 216 17.1 | 51 261 19.5 | 30 182 47 | 7 39 17.9 | 6 65 9.2 | 3 10 30.0 | 0 6 0 |
Sue, Jason Jaensch | 26 148 17.5 | 52 230 22.6 | 77 396 19.4 | 22 107 20.5 | 52 220 23.6 | 5 28 17.8 | 3 7 42.8 |
Matthew Seyers | 36 129 27.9 | 23 114 20.2 | 17 137 12.4 | 8 41 19.5 | 6 47 12.8 | 1 13 7.7 | 1 5 20.0 |
Jon O'Connor | 40 272 14.7 | 51 247 20.6 | 38 218 17.4 | 4 16 25.0 | 5 26 19.2 | 1 4 25.0 | nil |
Research - Trainers - Trainers Notebook. enhanced.
Today the Wizard Trainers Notebook reports on trainers ranked 1 to 10 on the Tasmanian metropolitan tracks in the 2022-2023 racing season.
In this listing I have identified those form factors that not only have an impact value on 1.3 but also show a win strike rate of 27% or more and a profit on turnover of 10% or more. This is obviously a more significant level of performance.
As before, I have broken down the overall stats into age groups (2yo, 3yo, 4yo and older) as there can be a difference in how these various age groups are prepared and perform. Also, I have limited the analysis to only those runs that were at odds of 10/1 or less, thereby removing the noise created by the longer odds runs which are really of no relevance in this exercise.
Note: It is possible to have more than one entry for a single factor. For example, the stable may have outperformed when backing up both within 8-14 days and 30-60 days.
Because the data is drawn from the Wizards national database, the form factors will be the same for trainers when they appear in the top trainer list in more than one state.
In the following listing those areas in which the trainer had a 1.3 impact value, and a win strike rate of 27% or better, and a positive return on investment of 10% more are highlighted in red.
Wiz-Ed
If you have any comment or suggestions about the Wizard Daily articles please feel free to drop me a line at:
Wiz-Ed@everyrace.com
Wizard - Trainer's Notebook - Trainers ranked 1 to 10 on the Tasmanian 2022-2023 metropolitan premiership table.
Scott Brunton | Insufficient data | days since last run 22-28 | days since last win 15-21 |
| | Field Strength +1.0 to +2.5 | days since last win 30-60 |
| | finish last start: 1st | finish last start: 1st |
| | runs from a spell: 2nd up | previous beat margin: 3.1-5.0 |
| | | dist change: -300 to -101m |
| | | |
John Blacker | Insufficient data | days since last run 1-7 | days since last run 1-7 |
| | days since last run 15-21 | days since last win 8-14 |
| | days since last run 22-28 | days since last win 15-21 |
| | days since last win 180-365 | days since last win 22-28 |
| | finish last start: 2nd or 3rd | Field Strength -2.5 to -1.0 |
| | runs from a spell: 4th up | finish last start: 1st |
| | dist change: -300 to -101m | runs from a spell: 2nd up |
| | | runs from a spell: 3rd up |
| | | weight change: +3.0 to +4.5 |
| | | weight change: +5.0 or more |
| | | |
Adam Trinder | Insufficient data | days since last run 180-365 | days since last run 30-60 |
| | days since last win 8-14 | days since last win 8-14 |
| | days since last win 15-21 | days since last win 22-28 |
| | Field Strength +1.0 to +2.5 | Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5 |
| | finish last start: 1st | finish last start: 1st |
| | previous beat margin: 3.1-5.0 | runs from a spell: 5th up |
| | runs from a spell: 1st up | |
| | runs from a spell: 3rd up | |
| | dist change: -300 to -101m | |
| | | |
L, D, T Wells | Insufficient data | days since last run 15-21 | days since last win 30-60 |
| | finish last start: 1st | days since last win 61-179 |
| | previous beat margin: 3.1-5.0 | Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5 |
| | runs from a spell: 1st up | dist change: -300 to -101m |
| | runs from a spell: 4th up | |
| | | |
Glenn Stevenson | Insufficient data | runs from a spell: 3rd up | days since last run 30-60 |
| | | days since last run 61-179 |
| | | days since last win 8-14 |
| | | days since last win 30-60 |
| | | Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5 |
| | | finish last start: 1st |
| | | runs from a spell: 1st up |
| | | runs from a spell: 5th up |
| | | |
Gary White | Insufficient data | Insufficient data | days since last run 8-14 |
| | | Field Strength +1.0 to +2.5 |
| | | finish last start: 1st |
| | | finish last start: 2nd or 3rd |
| | | previous beat margin: 0.1-3.0 |
| | | runs from a spell: 2nd up |
| | | runs from a spell: 3rd up |
| | | weight change: +0.0 to +2.5 |
| | | |
Stuart Gandy | runs from a spell: 2nd up | Field Strength -2.5 to -1.0 | days since last run 1-7 |
| | finish last start: 1st | days since last run 22-28 |
| | | days since last win 30-60 |
| | | Field Strength +1.0 to +2.5 |
| | | finish last start: 2nd or 3rd |
| | | previous beat margin: 0.1-3.0 |
| | | runs from a spell: 6th up |
| | | dist change: -300 to -101m |
| | | |
John, Tegan Key | Insufficient data | Insufficient data | days since last run 15-21 |
| | | days since last run 22-28 |
| | | days since last win 22-28 |
| | | Field Strength -4.5 to -3.0 |
| | | Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5 |
| | | finish last start: 1st |
| | | runs from a spell: 2nd up |
| | | runs from a spell: 6th up |
| | | |
Barry Campbell | Insufficient data | Field Strength -0.5 to +0.5 | days since last run 61-179 |
| | finish last start: 2nd or 3rd | days since last win 8-14 |
| | runs from a spell: 2nd up | finish last start: 1st |
| | dist change: +101 to +300 m | previous beat margin: 0.1-3.0 |
| | | |
John Luttrell | Insufficient data | previous beat margin: 0.1-3.0 | days since last run 15-21 |
| | dist change: -100 to +100 m | days since last win 8-14 |
| | | days since last win 15-21 |
| | | Field Strength -5.0 or more |
| | | Field Strength +3.0 to +4.5 |
| | | finish last start: 1st |
| | | previous beat margin: 3.1-5.0 |
| | | dist change: -300 to -101m |